Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers (QPR) Tips and Predictions AH Lucky68

England Championship

Analysis

Portsmouth

Queens Park Rangers (QPR)

Further Reading

Adijuntak888

Portsmouth WLLLWD Portsmouth will play in this fixture coming off the back of a 1-1 Championship draw vs Derby County. In that match, Portsmouth managed 48% possession and 4 shots at goal with 1 of them on target. For Portsmouth, the goals were scored by Callum Lang (6') and Hayden Matthews (45' Own goal). At the other end, Derby County had 12 attempts at goal with 6 on target. It has been seldom in recent times where Portsmouth have kept a clean sheet. The reality is that Portsmouth have seen their defence breached in 6 of their previous 6 games, leaking 8 goals along the way. Previous results aside, it remains to be seen whether such a trend shall be sustained in this match. Coming into this meeting, Portsmouth haven't lost in the league to Queens Park Rangers in their last 2 games. Queens Park Rangers Queens Park Rangers WLWWLW QPR will come into the clash after a 4-1 Championship win to defeat Leicester City in their last game. In that match, Queens Park Rangers mana

AH
ENG LCH Portsmouth - Queens Park Rangers (QPR)
Noah Will Won 11/17

Portsmouth VS Queens Park Rangers (QPR) Let's take a look at the EFL Championship match between Portsmouth and Queens Park Rangers. Listen to my analysis and I'll help you succeed in this game！ The home team, Portsmouth, is currently ranked 21st in the league. This season, Portsmouth's overall record is 5 wins, 6 draws and 10 losses. In home games, Portsmouth's record is 4 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses. At home, Portsmouth has scored 11 goals and conceded 12. They average 1.0 goal scored and 1.1 goals conceded per home game. The away team, Queens Park Rangers, is currently ranked 7th in the league. This season, Queens Park Rangers' overall record is 10 wins, 4 draws and 8 losses. In away games, their record is 4 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses. On the road, Queens Park Rangers has scored 12 goals and conceded 19. They average 1.1 goals scored and 1.7 goals conceded per away game. Let's take a look at the recent data of the two teams. The home team, Portsmouth, has scored 6 goals and conceded

AH
ENG LCH Portsmouth - Queens Park Rangers (QPR)
Sebastian B

Portsmouth VS Queens Park Rangers (QPR) Portsmouth has won 2, drawn 2, and lost 6 in their last 10 matches. They have performed well recently and been relatively stable in recent games. Queens Park Rangers has won 5, drawn 1, and lost 4 in their last 10 matches. The team has shown a multi - pronged attack. Portsmouth is eager to win this game. They have been performing well, demonstrating their combat ability. Their form has been remarkable, and there has been an obvious upward trend. Also, Portsmouth has a decent attacking power. However, Queens Park Rangers has improved their defense to some extent. Portsmouth has been in excellent form recently and has achieved multiple victories. In terms of the squad for this game, Portsmouth has an edge. Will they be able to build on their momentum, or will Queens Park Rangers turn the tables? Suggestion: Over 2.5 goals Score reference: 0-3, 2-1 Portsmouth has won 2, drawn 2, and lost 6 in their last 10 matches. The home - team has suffered two c

O/U
ENG LCH Portsmouth - Queens Park Rangers (QPR)

More Recommend

Cercle Brugge VS Saint Gilloise I'm a well - established expert with a long - term stable information source. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for you！ Sint - Truiden shows an obvious advantage in offensive efficiency. Its conversion rate of offensive finishes is 22.3%, higher than Cercle Brugge's 16.8%. The xG efficiency per offensive finish is 0.35, better than Cercle Brugge's 0.28. In the passing network, Sint - Truiden's key passing success rate is 81.2%, suppressing Cercle Brugge's 74.5%. The front - court passing value index of 1.83 compared to 1.56 reflects a more efficient offensive organization. In terms of midfield control, Sint - Truiden regains the ball 15.3 times per game on average and has 7.2 interceptions, outperforming Cercle Brugge's 12.1 and 5.4 times. In terms of running data, Sint - Truiden's total team running distance is 112.3 km with 15.6 high - intensity sprints, better than Cercle Brugge's 108.7 km and 12.9 sprints. View and suggestion:

AH
BEL D1 Cercle Brugge - Saint Gilloise
Stoke City VS Preston North End I've long provided stable information. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for everyone！ Stoke City has an advantage in recent offensive efficiency. Its offensive conversion rate of 14.3% is higher than Preston North End's 11.8%. The xG efficiency of Stoke City reaches 1.23 per game, more threatening than Preston's 1.05 per game. The key pass success rate of Stoke City is 78%, leading Preston's 72%. The value of front - court passes is 0.89 per pass, creating a higher - quality offense. In terms of midfield control, Stoke City's average ball possession rate of 61% suppresses Preston's 54%. The speed of counter - attacks is 2.3 times per minute, faster than Preston's 1.9 times per minute. In terms of running distance, the home team averages 112 km per game with 165 high - intensity sprints, better than Preston's 108 km and 148 times. View and suggestion: Under Suggestion: Under 2.25 (Exclusive for big bettors) In defense, Stoke City ha

O/U
ENG LCH Stoke City - Preston North End
Egypt VS South Africa I'm a well - known expert with long - term and stable information. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for all fans！ A comparison of the offensive efficiency between Egypt and South Africa shows that Egypt has an advantage in both offensive conversion rate (22% vs 15%) and xG efficiency (1.8 vs 1.2). Egypt's key passing success rate (85%) is significantly higher than that of South Africa (73%), and the value of its forward passes (2.4 key passes per 90 minutes) is more threatening. Egypt's midfield control rate reaches 58%, and the proportion of fast - transition attacks is 34%, better than South Africa's 26%. Both the high - intensity running distance (112km vs 107km) and the number of sprints (19 vs 14) reflect Egypt's physical advantage. View and suggestion: Home win. Suggestion: Egypt -0.5 (Exclusive for big fans). Egypt's defensive data comprehensively outperforms South Africa. Egypt's average number of tackles (14), interceptions (9) and

AH
CAF NC Egypt - South Africa

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Portsmouth VS Queens Park Rangers (QPR)